Exactly 25 Years ago, when VP Singh Swiss Bank's NAME was listening Applause. And 25 Years later Kaledn Narendra Modi referred to the Swiss Bank also Received Thunderous Applause. began Slogans. In the 1989th, the Swiss Bank's Electoral wind pushed to them the CHAIR of the VP and the PM in 1989, 25 years after the note then the corresponding wind Kaledn and corruption PM Narendra Modi also been sitting on the chair.
25 years ago, the first openly Bofors commission VP Singh, referring to the money deposited in Swiss banks every election rally. Every neighborhood. Every village. Trusted by the voters. VP Singh was in favor of the mandate. But after 25 years the mandate of VP Bofors Swiss bank, India has not even a penny of commission. So now held abroad Kaledn first question is: Will the conch or only dreams to come across India are showing . Because 25 years ago, 25 years after the same kind of passion VP Narendra Modi over Kaledn Something similar also in the Electoral Battle Emerged Pattern. A 25-year-old hit in the polls once again became Political Film. While any government played no role Kaledn not to return. The Modi government to the Supreme Court to here the name given to the holders of bank contains 627 names of those who worked at the Swiss bank withdrew a Whisl Blower. There are France to India. And these names should be introduced or not, the Manmohan Singh government is now complicating the Modi government. ध्यान दें तो वीपी सिंह के दौर में भी सीबीआई ने बोफोर्स जांच की पहल शुरु की और मौजूदा दोर में भी सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने 627 खाताधारकों के नाम सीबीआई को साझा करने का निर्देश देकर यह साफ कर दिया कि कालाधन सिर्फ टैक्स चोरी नहीं है बल्कि देश में ie, from the spoils of mining scandal in government policies Kaledn is the face of corruption.
अगर कालेधन के इसी चेहरे को राजनीति से जोडे तो फिर 1993 की वोहरा कमेठी की रिपोर्ट और मौजूदा वक्त में चुनाव आयोग का चुनाव प्रचार में अनअकाउंटेड मनी का इस्तेमाल उसी राजनीतिक सत्ता को कटघरे में खड़ा करती है जो सत्ता में आने के लिये स्विस बैंक का जिक्र which came to power after the Swiss bank has a compulsion calls. This question is so big because Kaladn Kaladn election issue and become part of the electoral propaganda offensive action against members who will then submit Kaladn? दूसरा सवाल जब देश की आर्थिक नीतियां ही कालाधन बनाने वाली हो तो फिर व्यवस्था का सबसे बड़ा पाया तो राजनीति ही होगी क्योंकि कालाधन के कटघरे में राजनीति, कारपोरेट, औघोगिक घराने, बिल्डर या बडे मीडिया हाउस से लेकर खेल और सिनेमा तक के घुरधंरों के नाम What are the signs of being open Ferhist of the government and the PM what he could be anyone? The most difficult question is that behind the Vohra Committee report on criminalization of politics two decades ago Kaledn open mention was made. Currently, shelter contest and winning the corporate capital, hundreds of leaders in the same way as the list Kaladn stood in front of the country's secular image. खामिया किस हद तक है या राजनीतिक मजबूरी कैसे कालाधन या भ्रष्टाचार के आगे नतमस्तक है इसका अंदाजा इससे भी मिल सकता है कि राज्यसभा के चालीस फीसदी सांसद अभी भी वैसी समितियों के सदस्य है जिन समितियों को उनके अपने धंधे के बारे में निर्णय लेना है यानी एक Kingfisher became a member of the Rajya Sabha, Civil Aviation while the owners were members of the committee and then went all the decisions are favorable to the Fisher King. Not only the Manmohan Singh government during the period 2012-13 in the Lok Sabha MPs sixty percent saw Kyshcn Question Hour Corporate and Industrial Grano will glance who had asked for a concession. And the truth is that the country continuously since 2007. Corporate and Industrial houses every year in tax concessions or by saying Sbseedi is 5 to 6 lakh crore.
Associated with mining companies in similar lines of Ferhist Drn-over of the fastest growing in the country, and the country's limestone mining revenues are enacting policies of the government in the dock. That is the big question then repeatedly in the last Lok Sabha elections, 500 billion dollars in foreign banks Kaledn which he was referring, either India or the country just politics Kaladn ever dream of a film was shown?
Comments