Skip to main content

How Narasimha Rao Was Humiliated In Death

Narasimha Rao and Sonia Gandhi
Narasimha Rao and Sonia Gandhi
The corpse was clad in white dhoti and golden silk kurta. At 2.30 p.m., it was brought from Delhi’s All India Institute of Medical Sciences to 9 Motilal Nehru Marg. P.V. Narasimha Rao, prime minister of India from 1991 to1996, had died at around 11 a.m., 23 December 2004. The doctors had needed a couple of hours to dress the body before sending it back home.
One of the first people to arrive at Rao’s house was Chandraswami, the bearded guru who had known him since 1971. Also present were his eight sons and daughters —whom he had kept at a distance — as well as the nephews and grandchildren he had been closer to. Eldest son, Ranga Rao — who had fought bitterly with his father — inconsolable.
Then began the politics.
The home minister, Shivraj Patil, suggested to Rao’s youngest son, Prabhakara, that ‘the body should be cremated in Hyderabad’. But the family preferred Delhi. After all, Rao had last been chief minister of Andhra Pradesh more than thirty years ago, and had since worked as Congress general secretary, Union minister, and finally prime minister — all in Delhi. On hearing this, the usually decorous Shivraj Patil snapped, ‘No one will come.’
Kashmiri Congressman Ghulam Nabi Azad, another aide of party president Sonia Gandhi, arrived. He too requested the family to move the body to Hyderabad. An hour later, Prabhakara received a call on his mobile phone. It was Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy, the Congress chief minister of Andhra Pradesh and no friend of Narasimha Rao’s. ‘I just heard about it,’ Reddy said, ‘I am near Anantapur, and I’ll be in Delhi by this evening. Take it from me. We will give him a grand funeral [in Hyderabad].
Also read:--
NIGAMRAJENDRA28.BLOGSPOT.COM
Veteran Congress leader, former union minister Margaret Alva recently released her book ‘Courage and Commitment.’ Rupa Publications has pu...

At 6.30 p.m., Sonia Gandhi entered the house in Motilal Nehru Marg, named after her great-grandfather-in-law. Prime minister Manmohan Singh followed, along with Pranab Mukherjee. They walked through the long corridor to the room at the end where Rao’s body, now decked in flowers, was displayed. ‘What do you want to do with the body?’ the prime minister asked Prabhakara. ‘These people say it should be in Hyderabad.’ ‘This [Delhi] is his karmabhoomi,’ Prabhakara replied, ‘you should convince your Cabinet colleagues.’ Manmohan nodded. Sonia Gandhi was standing nearby. She said little.
The journalist Sanjaya Baru arrived. His bureaucrat father knew Rao from the 1960s. As Baru entered the corridor, Sonia’s political secretary tapped him on the shoulder. ‘You know the family,’ Ahmed Patel said. ‘The body should be taken to Hyderabad. Can you convince them?’ Baru continued walking towards the end of the corridor, when he heard someone cry. He turned left to see Kalyani Shankar sobbing in a sideroom. Kalyani had been Rao’s most trusted friend for the last two decades.
Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy had by now reached Delhi. ‘It is our government, trust me,’ he told Rao’s family. ‘Let him be moved to Hyderabad. We will build a grand memorial for him there.’ Rao’s daughter S. Vani Devi says, ‘YSR was playing a major role in convincing [the] family to get the dead body to Hyderabad.’
The family wanted a commitment that a memorial would be built for Rao in Delhi. The Congress leaders present said yes. But considering how the party had treated Rao in his retirement, the family wanted to make doubly sure. At 9.30 p.m., they paid a visit to the one man who had stood by Narasimha Rao in the last years of his life. Manmohan Singh was wearing his nightdress, a white kurta-pyjama, when Rao’s family met him at his official residence on Race Course Road. When Shivraj Patil explained the demand for a memorial in Delhi, Manmohan replied, ‘No problem, we will do it.’ Prabhakara recalls, ‘We sensed even then that Sonia-ji did not want Father’s funeral in Delhi. She did not want a memorial [in Delhi] . . . She did not want him [to be seen] as an all-India leader . . . [But] there was pressure.’
‘We agreed.’
The next day, 24 December 2004, leaders from across the political spectrum —from communists to BJP leaders — all came to pay their respects. At 10 a.m., the body was draped in the national flag, put on a flower-decked carriage pulled by an army vehicle, and escorted by military personnel in a slow procession towards the airport. Along the way, they planned to stop at 24 Akbar Road, the Congress party headquarters. Ever since Narasimha Rao had first moved into 9, Motilal Nehru Marg in 1980, he had made this journey countless times.
As the body approached 24 Akbar Road, located adjacent to Sonia Gandhi’s residence, the funeral procession slowed. The entrance gate to the compound looked firmly shut. There were several senior Congressmen present, but hardly any cadres had been rustled up. No slogans filled the air, just deathly silence. The carriage stopped on the pavement outside, as Sonia Gandhi and others came out to pay their respects.
It was customary for the bodies of past Congress presidents to be taken inside the party headquarters so that ordinary workers could pay their respects. The family was somewhat dazed when this did not happen. A friend of Rao’s asked a senior Congresswoman to let the body in. ‘The gate does not open,’ she replied. ‘This was untrue,’ the friend remembers.‘When Madhavrao Scindia died [some years earlier] the gate was opened for him.’ Manmohan Singh now lives in a guarded bungalow a few minutes from Akbar Road. When asked why Rao’s body wasn’t allowed into the Congress headquarters, he replies that he was present, but has no knowledge of this. Another Congressman is more forthcoming. ‘We were expecting the gate to be opened . . . but no order came. Only one person could give that order.’
He adds, ‘She did not give it.’
Excerpt from “Half-Lion: How P.V. Narasimha Rao Transformed India” by Vijay Sitapati, VIking, 362 pages.

Comments

AUTHOR

My photo
shannomagan
To write on general topics and specially on films;THE BLOGS ARE DEDICATED TO MY PARENTS:SHRI M.B.L.NIGAM(January 7,1917-March 17,2005) and SMT.SHANNO DEVI NIGAM(November 23,1922-January24,1983)

Popular posts from this blog

कायस्थ कौन हैं ?

सर्वप्रथम तो ये जान लें आप सब कि ना तो मै जातिवादी हुँ और ना ही मुझे जातिवादी बनने का शौक है और ना ही कायस्थ समाज को जागृत करने मे मेरा कोई स्वार्थ छिपा है। मै कल भी एक कट्टर सनातनी था आज भी एक कट्टर सनातनी हुँ और विश्वास दिलाता हुँ सनातन धर्म के प्रति मेरी ये कट्टरता भविष्य मे भी बनी रहेगी। इन शब्दों के बावजूद भी हमे कोई जातिवादी कहे तो मै बस इतना ही कहुँगा कि कुत्तो के भौकने से हाथी रास्ता नही बदला करते। मै ‘कायस्थ समाज’ से संबंध रखता हूँ । जो मेरे मित्र इस से सर्वथा अपरिचित हैं, उनकी जानकारी के लिए बता दुँ कि उत्तर भारत के बहुलांश क्षेत्रों मे कायस्थों की जबर उपस्थिति मौजूद है, हालांकि यह समाज देश के अन्य हिस्सों मे भी विद्यमान है । इनकी जनसंख्या काफी सीमित है परंतु इस वर्ग से संबन्धित सम्मानित महापुरुषों , विद्वानो, राजनेताओ , समाज सेवियों की एक लंबी फेहरिस्त मिलेगी जिन्होंने अपनी विद्वता, कर्मठता और प्रतिभा का लोहा पूरे विश्व मे मनवाया है । सम्राट अकबर के नवरत्न बीरबल से लेकर आधुनिक समय मे स्वामी विवेकानंद , राजा राम मोहन रॉय , महर्षि अरविंद ,श्रीमंत शंकर देव ,महर्षि महेश योगी, मु…

गीता को फाड़कर कचरे की पेटी में फेंक देना चाहिए -- दलित नेता विजय मानकर

सोशल मीडियो पर इन दिनों एक वीडियो तेजी से वायरल हो रहा है। इस वीडियो में अंबेकराइट पार्टी ऑफ इंडिया के प्रेसीडेंट विजय मानकर कह रहे हैं कि गीता को फाड़कर कूड़ेदान में फेंक देना चाहिए। आपको बता दें कि विजय मानकर का ये बयान अली शोहराब नाम के फेसबुक पेज से शेयर किया गया है। इस वीडियो को एक दिन में ही लगभग 1 लाख लोग देख चुके हैं। इसे अब तक 6 हजार लोगों ने अपने फेसबुक वॉल पर शेयर भी किया है। वीडियो में विजय मानकर मंच से लगभग चुनौती भरे अंदाज में कह रहे हैं जो गीता युद्ध और हिंसा को धर्म बताती है उसे कचरे के डिब्बे में फेंक देना चाहिए। हालांकि ये वीडियो कब का है इस बारे में कोई आधिकारिक पुष्टी नहीं की गई है। जनसत्ताऑनलाइन भी इसवीडियो की पुष्टी नहीं करता है। वीडियो में दिख रहा है कि अंबेकराइट पार्टी ऑफ इंडिया के प्रेसीडेंट विजय मानकर कह रहे हैं कि ‘मैं आज इस मंच से कहता हूं कि गीता को कचरे की पेटी में फेंक देना चाहिए। गीता कहती है कि मैंने वर्ण व्यवस्था बनाई है, गीता कहती है कि ब्राह्मण श्रेष्ठ होते हैं हमें ब्राह्मणों की पूजा करनी चाहिए। गीता महिलाओं को कनिष्ठ मानती है, हिंसा और युद्ध को ध…

गरुड़ शास्त्र में पराई स्त्री के साथ सम्बन्ध बनाने एवं दैनिक कर्म के परिणाम

हमारे गृहस्थ जीवन के बारे में भारतीय प्राचीन शास्त्रों बहुत से सुझाव लिखे गये है| हर काम को करने के नतीजों के बारे में बताया गया है, फिर वो चाहे अच्छे कर्म हो या बुरे, अच्छे कर्मो का नतीज़ा हमेशा ही अच्छा होता है वही बुरे कर्मों के बुरे नतीजे भी लोगो को भुगतने पड़ते है।  शास्त्रों के अनुसार किसी पराई स्त्री के साथ सम्भोग करना पाप माना जाता है, और ऐसे इंसान को सीधे नर्क में जाना पड़ता है। वही किसी स्त्री के ऊपर बुरी नज़र रखने वाले, किसी पराई स्त्री के साथ संभोग का सोचने वाले लोगो को भी नर्क में ही जगह दी जाती है।
एक समय था, जब दिल्ली के पुराना किला स्थित भैरों मंदिर में किले की दीवारों पर चित्रों के माध्यम से प्राणियों को दुष्कर्मों से दूर रहने के लिए मृत्यु उपरान्त यमलोक में दी जाने वाली यातनाओं से अवगत करवाया जाता था। लेकिन पश्चिमी सभ्यता के मानव जीवन पर हावी होने के कारण मानव जीवन से हिन्दू मान्यताएँ धूमिल ही नहीं हुईं, बल्कि आस्था पर भी आघात हुआ है।
परिवार में किसी मृत्यु उपरान्त गरुड़ पुराण पाठ किया जाता है, लेकिन मनुष्य है, इसे केवल मृतक तक ही सीमित समझ एक धार्मिक पूर्ति मात्र मान कर…